Appendix C1: Matrices for SARS Response in Healthcare Facilities
Supplement C: Preparedness and Response In Healthcare Facilities
Public Health Guidance for Community-Level Preparedness and Response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Version 2/3
printer friendly version [11 pages]
Framework for Contingency Planning
SARS-CoV transmission risks in healthcare facilities depend not only on the extent of SARS activity in the community and world but also on the level of SARS activity in the facility. Recommended strategies for SARS response are therefore based on the following framework, which provides options for escalating or otherwise modifying control measures based on facility-specific categories of SARS activity and transmission risks.
Categories of SARS Activity and Transmission Risk in a Healthcare Facility
No cases of SARS in the facility -
Healthcare facilities in this category are those in which:
- No potential or known SARS patients are being cared for as inpatients or outpatients, AND
- No known transmission of SARS-CoV to patients, visitors, or healthcare workers has occurred.
A few cases in the facility, but all cases are imported (NO nosocomial transmission) -
Facilities in this category are those that are providing care to a limited number of potential or known SARS cases as inpatients or outpatients (e.g., in the emergency department) but in which no recognized SARS-CoV transmission to other patients, visitors, or healthcare workers has occurred.
A larger number of SARS cases in the facility OR nosocomial transmission with all cases linked to a clearly identified source -
Facilities in this category include those with an elevated risk of transmission due to:
- A large number of SARS patients,
- A significant number of unprotected exposures among patients, visitors, or healthcare workers, OR
- Transmission to other patients or to healthcare workers under circumstances in which the exposures are clearly understood and control measures are in place to prevent further spread.
Cases attributed to nosocomial transmission with NO clearly identified source -
Facilities in this category include those with nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV in which the presence of unlinked cases (i.e., cases in which the exposure risk cannot be clearly identified) makes it difficult to determine which patients and visitors may have been exposed; therefore, all new-onset febrile illnesses in patients and staff may represent SARS-CoV disease.
Matrices for SARS Response in Healthcare Facilities
The matrices on the following pages summarize suggested SARS control measures in healthcare facilities.
- For the inpatient and emergency department settings (Matrix 1), control measures depend on both the level of SARS activity in the facility and in the community. If SARS patients are seen in the facility's emergency department but no SARS patients are admitted to the facility, the emergency department may require more extensive control measures than the inpatient areas.
- In the outpatient and long-term care settings (Matrix 2 and Matrix 3), control measures depend on the level of SARS activity in the community.
These matrices are intended to provide guidance on potential control measures. Facilities will need flexibility in implementing control measures because requirements will likely change as an outbreak progresses and more information becomes available.
Top of PageMatrix 1: Recommendations for Inpatient Facilities and Emergency Departments
Level of SARS activity |
Suggested actions |
---|---|
No cases of SARS in the facility |
1) Triage activities/facility access controls
2) Patient placement
3) Designated personnel
4) Surveillance
5) Healthcare worker restrictions
|
A few cases in the facility, but all cases are imported (NO nosocomial transmission) |
1) Triage activities/facility access controls
2) Patient placement
3) Designated personnel
4) Surveillance
5) Healthcare worker restrictions
|
A larger number of SARS cases in the facility OR nosocomial transmission with all cases linked to a clearly identified source |
1) Triage activities/access controls
2) Patient placement
3) Designated personnel
4) Surveillance
5) Healthcare worker restrictions
|
Cases attributed to nosocomial transmission with NO clearly identified source |
1) Triage activities/access controls
2) Patient placement
3) Designated personnel
4) Surveillance
5) Healthcare worker restrictions
|
Matrix 2: Recommendations for Outpatient Facilities/Areas
Level of SARS activity |
Suggested actions |
---|---|
No person-to-person SARS transmission reported anywhere in the world |
1) Patient screening and precautions
2) Healthcare worker precautions
3) Infrastructure issues
|
Presence of person-to-person SARS transmission worldwide but no known transmission in the area around the facility |
1) Patient screening and precautions
2) Healthcare worker precautions
3) Infrastructure issues
|
Known transmission in the area around the facility |
1) Patient screening and precautions
2) Healthcare worker precautions
3) Infrastructure issues |
Matrix 3: Recommendations for Long-Term Care Facilities
Level of SARS activity |
Suggested actions |
---|---|
No person-to-person SARS transmission reported anywhere in the world |
1) Patient precautions
2) Healthcare worker precautions
3) Infrastructure issues
|
Presence of person-to-person SARS transmission worldwide, but no known transmission in the area around the facility |
1) Patient precautions
2) Healthcare worker precautions 3) Infrastructure issues 4) Access controls
|
Known transmission in the area around the facility |
1) Patient precautions
2) Healthcare worker precautions
3) Infrastructure issues 4) Access controls
|
Related Pages
- Summary
- I. Rationale and Goals
- II. Lessons Learned
- III. Preparedness Planning for Healthcare Facilities
- IV. Recommended Preparedness and Response Activities in Healthcare Facilities
- V. Community Healthcare Delivery Issues
- References
- Appendix C1: Matrices for SARS Response in Healthcare Facilities
- Appendix C2: Checklist for SARS Preparedness in Healthcare Facilities
- Page last reviewed: May 3, 2005
- Page last updated: May 3, 2005
- Content source: