We need you! Join our contributor community and become a WikEM editor through our open and transparent promotion process.
Cardiogenic shock
From WikEM
Contents
Background
- Leading cause of death in patients with ACS who reach the hospital alive
Etiologies
- Myocardial infarction
- Pump failure
- Mechanical complications
- Acute MR (papillary muscle rupture)
- VSD
- Free-wall rupture
- RV infarction
- Decreased forward flow
- Sepsis
- Rate-related
- Bradycardia
- Tachycardia
- Myocarditis
- Myocardial contusion
- Cardiomyopathy
- Mechanical obstruction to forward flow
- Aortic stenosis
- HOCM
- Mitral stenosis
- Pericardial
- LV regurgitation
- Chordal rupture
- Aortic insufficiency
Clinical Features
Physical Exam
- Assess for signs of CHF
- elevated JVD, pulmonary edema, S3
- Assess for valvular disease (mitral regurgitation, critical aortic stenosis, or aortic regurgitation)
- Assess for end-organ hypoperfusion
- cool/mottled extremities, weak pulses, altered mental status, decreased UOP
- Assess for pulsus paradoxus (cardiac tamponade)
Differential Diagnosis
Shock
- Cardiogenic
- Acute valvular Regurgitation/VSD
- CHF
- Dysrhythmia
- ACS
- Myocardial Contusion
- Myocarditis
- Drug toxicity (e.g. beta blocker, CCB, or bupropion OD)
- Obstructive
- Distributive
- Hypovolemic
- Severe dehydration
- Hemorrhagic shock (traumatic and non-traumatic)
Evaluation
Workup
Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)[1]
- Biologically active metabolite of proBNP (released from ventricles in response to increased volume/pressure)
- Utility is controversial and may not affect patient centered outcomes[2]
- May be trended to gauge treatment response in acute decompensated CHF
- May have false negative with isolated diastolic dysfunction
- Measurement
- <100 pg/mL: Negative for acute CHF (Sn 90%, NPV 89%)
- 100-500 pg/mL: Indeterminate (Consider differential diagnosis and pre-test probability)
- >500 pg/mL: Positive for acute CHF (Sp 87%, PPV 90%)
NT-proBNP[3][4][5]
- N-terminal proBNP (biologically inert metabolite of proBNP)
- <300 pg/mL → CHF unlikely
- CHF likely in:
- >450 pg/mL in age < 50 years old
- >900 pg/mL in 50-75 years old
- >1800 pg/mL in > 75 years old
Differential Diagnosis (Elevated BNP)
- CHF/ACS/Cardiogenic shock
- PE
- Pulmonary Hypertension
- Renal Failure
- LVH
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage
BNP In Obese Patients
- Visceral fat expansion leads to increased clearance of active natriuretic peptides[6]
- Obese patients also frequently treated for hypertension or coronary artery disease which may also contribute to lower BNP levels
Interpretation
- In one study of 204 patients with acute CHF, an inverse relationship between BMI and BNP was noted. The standard cutoff of 100pg/mL resulted in a 20% false-negative rate[7]
- Analysis of a subgroup of patients with documented BMI from the Breathing Not Properly study showed that a lower cutoff was more appropriate to maintain 90% sensitivity in obese and morbidly obese patients (54pg/mL)[8]
Management
General
Aim for MAP >65
- Consider etiologies (see above) and treat specific one, if present
- Consider small fluid challenge (250-500cc normal saline IV) or fluid removal, depending on estimation of patient's point on Starling curve
- Increase inotropy
- Dobutamine +/- levophed OR dopamine
- Dobutamine may initially drop pressures, so may need to use second agent to maintain BP
- Consider milrinone or beta-blocker reversal if patient is on a beta-blocker
- Consider calcium chloride 1 g if hypocalcemic or normocalcemic through good PIV or central line
- Dobutamine +/- levophed OR dopamine
- Consider transfusion if hemoglobin < 10 (be aware of added fluid)
- Consider intubation
- Decreases O2 demand BUT may worsen preload
Specific Situations
Mitral Regurgitation
Increase forward flow
- Dobutamine (contractility) + nitroprusside (afterload reduction)
ACS
- PCI or thrombolysis
Aortic stenosis
Decrease afterload (with extreme caution in very small, carefully-titrated doses)
- Agents:
- Do not give preload reducers such as nitro
- Patients are flow dependent over stenotic value. Flow proportional to degree of stenosis and afterload.
Toxins
Vasopressors
Pressor | Initial Dose | Max Dose | Cardiac Effect | BP Effect | Arrhythmias | Special Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dobutamine | 2.5 mcg/kg/min | 10-40 mcg/kg/min | mainly inotrope (ß1) | alpha effect minimal | Some HR(ß1) increase. Also Increase SA and AV node fx | Debut Research 1979[9] Isoproterenol has most Β2 vasodilatory and Β1 HR effects |
Dopamine | 2 mcg/kg/min | 20-50 mcg/kg/min | β1 and NorEpi release | α effects if > 20mcg/kg/min | Arrhythmogenic from β1 effects | More adverse events when used in shock compared to Norepi[10] |
Epinepherine | 0.1-1 mcg/kg/min | |||||
Norepinephrine | 8-12 mcg/min | 30 mcg/min | β1 direct effect | β1 and α1,2 effects | Less arrhythmias than Dopamine[10] | Increases MAP, coronary perfusion pressure, little β2 effects. |
Milrinone | 50 mcg/kg x 10 min | 0.375-75 mcg/kg/min | Direct influx of Ca2+ channels | Smooth muscle vasodilator | PDE Inhibitor which increases Ca2+ uptake by sarcolemma. No venodilatory activity | |
Phenylephrine | 100-180 mcg/min then 40-60 mcg/min | 0.4-9 mcg/kg/min | Alpha agonist | Long half life | ||
Vasopressin | Fixed Dose | 0.4 U/min | unknown | increases via ADH peptide | should not be titrated due to ischemic effects | |
Methylene blue[11] | IV bolus 2 mg/kg over 15 min | 1-2 mg/kg/hour | Possible increased inotropy, cardiac use of ATP | Inhibits NO mediated peripheral vasodilation | Don't use in G6PD deficiency, ARDS, pulmonary hypertension |
Medication | IV Dose (mcg/kg/min) | Concentration |
Norepinephrine (Levophed) | 0.1-2 mcg/kg/min | 8mg in 500mL D5W |
Dopamine | 2-20 mcg/kg/min | 400mg in 250 D5W |
Dobutamine | 2-20 mcg/kg/min | 250mg in 250 mg D5W |
Epinephrine | 0.1-1 mcg/kg/min | 1mg in 250 D5W |
Disposition
- Admission, frequently to intensive or higher-level of care
See Also
External Links
Video
References
- ↑ Maisel AS, Krishnaswamy P, Nowak RM, et al. Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(3):161-167. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa020233.
- ↑ Carpenter CR et al. BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE IN THE EVALUATION OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT DYSPNEA: IS THERE A ROLE? J Emerg Med. 2012 Feb; 42(2): 197–205.
- ↑ Januzzi JL, van Kimmenade R, Lainchbury J, et al. NT-proBNP testing for diagnosis and short-term prognosis in acute destabilized heart failure: an international pooled analysis of 1256 patients: the International Collaborative of NT-proBNP Study. Eur Heart J. 2006 Feb. 27(3):330-7.
- ↑ Kragelund C, Gronning B, Kober L, Hildebrandt P, Steffensen R. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and long-term mortality in stable coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 17. 352(7):666-75.
- ↑ Moe GW, Howlett J, Januzzi JL, Zowall H,. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing improves the management of patients with suspected acute heart failure: primary results of the Canadian prospective randomized multicenter IMPROVE-CHF study. Circulation. 2007 Jun 19. 115(24):3103-10.
- ↑ Clerico A, Giannoni A, Vittorini S, Emdin M. The paradox of low BNP levels in obesity. Heart Fail Rev. 2011;17(1):81-96. doi:10.1007/s10741-011-9249-z.
- ↑ Krauser DG, Lloyd-Jones DM, Chae CU, et al. Effect of body mass index on natriuretic peptide levels in patients with acute congestive heart failure: A ProBNP Investigation of Dyspnea in the Emergency Department (PRIDE) substudy. Am Heart J. 2005;149(4):744-750. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2004.07.010.
- ↑ Daniels LB, Clopton P, Bhalla V, et al. How obesity affects the cut-points for B-type natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of acute heart failure. Results from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study. Am Heart J. 2006;151(5):999-1005. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2005.10.011.
- ↑ Edmund H. Sonnenblick, M.D., William H. Frishman, M.D., and Thierry H. LeJemtel, M.D. Dobutamine: A New Synthetic Cardioactive Sympathetic Amine
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 De Backer Daniel et al. Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock. NEJM 363(9). 779-789
- ↑ Pasin L et al. Methylene blue as a vasopressor: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Mar;15(1):42-8.