Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Notes from the Field: Adverse Reaction After Vaccinia Virus Vaccination — New Mexico, 2016


Article Metrics

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Views:

Citations:

Altmetric:

Metric Details

Nicole Middaugh, ScD1; Brett Petersen, MD2; Andrea M. McCollum, PhD2; Chad Smelser, MD3 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation

On February 4, 2016, the New Mexico Department of Health (NMDOH) was contacted regarding a patient who had received ACAM2000* smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine 12 days earlier as part of an institutional review board–approved study at a plasma donation center and had numerous lesions surrounding the inoculation site and on the opposite arm, back, and abdomen. ACAM2000 is a live-virus vaccine indicated for active immunization against smallpox. Vaccinia virus is highly effective in preventing smallpox by stimulating an immune response to the closely related Orthopoxvirus. The inoculation site is considered infectious until the scab falls off and intact skin has regrown (2–4 weeks) (1,2). The patient, a man aged 57 years, had no ocular, oral, nasal, or genital lesions. He enrolled in the study on January 22, after meeting inclusion criteria and not having a condition that precluded vaccination (immunosuppression, heart disease, or history or presence of eczema) (1). The vaccination study objective was to induce production of high antivaccinia virus antibody titers for the collection of plasma to be used in manufacturing vaccinia immune globulin intravenous (VIGIV), which is produced by removing and purifying antivaccinia antibodies from plasma of persons with immunity to smallpox.

Adverse reactions to vaccinia vaccination range from mild and self-limited to severe and life-threatening, including inoculation site signs and symptoms, constitutional symptoms, generalized vaccinia, eczema vaccinatum, and progressive vaccinia (1,3). The most frequent complication is inadvertent inoculation at other sites (self and contacts) (24) with an estimated occurrence rate of 42.1 cases per 1 million vaccinations (1). Autoinoculation, the unintentional transfer of virus from the vaccination site to elsewhere on the vaccinee’s body, can occur from hands or fomites; the most common nonocular transfer sites are the arm, elbow, and shoulder (2,3). Autoinoculation lesions progress through the same stages as the vaccination site lesion; when autoinoculation occurs >5 days postvaccination, lesions and progression are often attenuated (2,3).

Study participants received instructions regarding proper inoculation site management and hand hygiene and materials for wound care. On February 3, (day 11 postvaccination), the patient reported a fever of 101°F (38°C) and three lesions near the inoculation site. On February 4, he arrived at the plasma center with numerous lesions surrounding the inoculation site and 20–30 lesions on his contralateral arm, abdomen, and back. Plasma center personnel requested NMDOH assistance in arranging possible hospital admission for VIGIV treatment.

After consulting CDC’s Poxvirus and Rabies Branch, NMDOH interviewed the patient and plasma center personnel, communicated with the local hospital and its infectious disease consultant, assessed the patient’s residence, and collected specimens from the inoculation site and surrounding lesions. The patient lived alone in a communal apartment building with shared bathrooms, kitchen, laundry facility, and fitness center. He showered in an older unit with limited use by other residents and did not share linens or towels, cook, or use the gym. He had a private bedroom, did not share his bed, and did not report any visits by friends or family members to his single-room apartment. He reported cleaning around the inoculation site with alcohol wipes when changing the dressing. On the basis of the patient interview and review of photos of the transferred lesions, neither hospitalization nor treatment with VIGIV was recommended. The plasma donation center reported the event to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

DNA for both Orthopoxvirus and nonvariola Orthopoxvirus was detected from the patient’s specimens, consistent with ACAM2000 vaccination. The patient’s lesions likely resulted from inadvertent autoinoculation caused by handling the area around the vaccination site during redressing. To prevent additional direct or indirect transmission, NMDOH advised the patient regarding proper vaccination site bandaging and hand hygiene, cleaning communal spaces (e.g., shower and sinks) with bleach, doing his own laundry, and refraining from gym use until all lesions resolved.

Although inadvertent inoculation is a recognized adverse event following vaccination with vaccinia virus, neither NMDOH nor four of five other public health departments were aware that this study was being conducted, demonstrating the need for communication among commercial sites and state and local health departments to ensure establishment of mutually acceptable patient care protocols. Coordination among the patient, plasma center personnel, hospital, infectious disease consultants, and NMDOH helped prevent spread to others. Adverse events occurring after receipt of vaccines should be reported to VAERS.


Corresponding author: Nicole Middaugh, nmiddaugh@cdc.gov, 505-827-0099.

1Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 2Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; 3New Mexico Department of Health.


* Sanofi Pasteur Biologics, LLC, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

https://vaers.hhs.gov/index.

References

  1. Food and Drug Administration. Highlights of prescribing information. ACAM2000 (smallpox [vaccinia] vaccine, live). Silver Spring, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration; 2015. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM142572.pdf
  2. Tack DM, Karem KL, Montgomery JR, et al. Unintentional transfer of vaccinia virus associated with smallpox vaccines: ACAM2000 compared with Dryvax. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013;9:1489–96. CrossRef PubMed
  3. Casey C, Vellozzi C, Mootrey GT, et al. . Surveillance guidelines for smallpox vaccine (vaccinia) adverse reactions. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006;55(No. RR-1). PubMed
  4. Wenger P, Oleske JM, Kohl KS, et al. . Inadvertent inoculation as an adverse event following exposure to vaccinia virus: case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine 2007;25:5754–62. CrossRef PubMed

Suggested citation for this article: Middaugh N, Petersen B, McCollum AM, Smelser C. Notes from the Field: Adverse Reaction After Vaccinia Virus Vaccination — New Mexico, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:1351–1352. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6547a4.

Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

TOP
window.CDC.Policy.External.init();