Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

2013 Assisted Reproductive Technology National Summary Report

2013 National Report

This report uses pooled data presented as graphs and charts to provide an in-depth picture of the type, number, and outcomes of ART cycles performed in the United States.

2013 National Summary Report [PDF - 1.5 MB]

2013 National Summary Report Figures

Acknowledgments and Introduction to the National Summary Report

Section 1: Overview

Section 2: ART Cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos

What are the steps for an ART cycle using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Why were some ART cycles canceled? [PDF - 1.37MB]

How are success rates of ART measured? [PDF - 1.37MB]

What percentage of ART cycles resulted in pregnancy? [PDF - 1.37MB]

What percentage of pregnancies resulting from ART ended in a live birth? [PDF - 1.37MB]

What was the risk of a multiple-fetus pregnancy or multiple-infant birth after ART? [PDF - 1.37MB]

What were the risks of having a preterm or low birth weight infant after ART? [PDF - 1.37MB]

What were the ages of women who use ART? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Did percentages of pregnancies, live births, and births of a single live infant differ by a woman’s age? [PDF - 1.37MB]

How did percentages of ART cycles that resulted in pregnancies, live births, and births of single live infants differ among women aged 40 or older? [PDF - 1.37MB]

How did the risk of miscarriage differ by a woman’s age? [PDF - 1.37MB]

How did a woman’s age affect her chances of progressing through the stages of ART? [PDF - 1.37MB]

What were the causes of infertility among ART patients? [PDF - 1.37MB]

How did infertility diagnosis affect the percentage of ART cycles resulting in live birth? [PDF - 1.37MB]

How did previous birth impact live-birth outcomes resulting from ART? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Did previous miscarriage impact live-birth outcomes resulting from ART among women with no previous births? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Did previous unsuccessful ART use impact live-birth outcomes among women with no previous births? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Did the use of ICSI differ by age group or by male factor infertility diagnosis? [PDF - 1.37MB]

How did ICSI use and male factor infertility impact live-birth rates per retrieval? [PDF - 1.37MB]

How many embryos were typically transferred in an ART procedure? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Did implantation rates differ by a woman’s age? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Did the number of embryos transferred impact the percentage of single, term, and normal birth weight infants born? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Were multiple infants more likely to be born if more embryos were transferred? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Were live births more likely if more embryos were transferred for good-prognosis women? [PDF - 1.37MB] 

How long after egg retrieval did embryo transfer occur? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Were day 5 embryo transfers more likely to result in a live birth? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Did the number of embryos transferred per woman differ for day 3 and day 5 transfers? [PDF - 1.37MB]

How did the multiple-infant birth risk vary by the day of embryo transfer among fresh nondonor transfers? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Were percentages of day 5 transfers that resulted in live births affected by the number of embryos transferred for good-prognosis women? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Did percentages of transfers resulting in live births differ by gestational carrier use? [PDF - 1.37MB]

Section 3: ART Cycles using frozen nondonor embryos

Section 4: ART Cycles using donor eggs

Section 5: ART Trends, 2004–2013

Top