Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

ATSDR Presentation to the Washington, DC, Scientific Advisory Board

Regarding Exposure Investigations

Presented by Susan Metcalf, MD, MSPH on April 25, 2001


Slide 1
Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry
  • Susan W. Metcalf, MD, MSPH

 
Slide 2
Exposure Investigation
Spring Valley Chemical Munitions
Washington, DC
  • Ketna Mistry, M.D., F.A.A.P
  • Ken Orloff, Ph.D., DABT
Slide 3
ATSDR

The primary public health agency for addressing human health issues that might arise from exposure to hazardous substances
Slide 4

Continuum for Relating Environmental Contamination
with Clinical Disease

Slide 5
Purpose of an Exposure Investigation

To better characterize past, current, and possible future human exposures to hazardous substances in the environment.
Slide 6
Exposure Investigation: Data Gathering
  • Environmental samples
  • Biomarkers
  • Exposure-dose reconstruction
Slide 7
Arsenic Biomarkers: Blood
  • Quantifies the absorbed Arsenic
  • Clears within a few hours
  • Not useful for low-level exposure
slide 8
Arsenic Biomarkers: Urine
  • Good marker of recent exposure
    • (3-4 days)
  • Includes both inorganic and organic forms
  • Reference range available
slide 9
Total Arsenic in Urine
  • Inorganic As (As+3, As+5)
  • MMA (monomethylarsonic acid)
  • DMA (dimethylarsenic acid)
  • Trimethylated forms
    • Arsenobetaine
    • Arsenocholine
slide 10
Arsenic Biomarkers: Hair
  • Measures several months of exposure
  • Collection is non-invasive
slide 11
Limitations of Hair as Biomarker
  • Possibility of external contamination
  • Paucity of reference range data for unexposed populations
slide 12
Playground Arsenic Levels
  • Soil arsenic levels
    • Average 57 ppm
    • Highest level 498 ppm
  • Children immediately relocated to another area of the campus
slide 13
Playground Characteristics
  • Covered with 2 inches of mulch or grass in some areas
  • Playground is periodically remulched
slide 14
Target Population
  • Daycare roster:
    • 28 children
    • 4 adult staff
  • Length of time at daycare:
    • ~50% present: < 7 months
    • ~50% present: > 1 year
slide 15
Other Sources of Arsenic
  • Wood preservatives
  • Pesticides
  • Arsenic containing herbal medicines
  • Parental occupational exposure
  • Hobbies
  • Consumption of seafood
  • Pica (soil eating) behavior
slide 16
Results
  • Hair samples for arsenic:
  • 24/ 32 hair samples : not detected
  • 8 / 32 hair samples: detected
  • 8 Arsenic detected hair samples ranged from 0.10 ppm to 0.14 ppm
slide 17
Background Hair Arsenic Levels
  • Textbooks: < 1 ppm
  • National Research Council: 0.2 ppm
  • NCEH: 95th percentile: 0.28 ppm
slide 18
Conclusion
  • Hair arsenic levels were not elevated in the 32 participants of this exposure investigation
  • Therefore, no unusual exposure to arsenic was found in the participants at the Child Daycare Center
slide 19
Speciated Urine Arsenic (µg/L)(Kalman, 1990)


Age Group
(boys)
RushtonControl
0-6 years6511
7-13 years3013
14-20 years109
Mean As soil conc353 ppm7-57 ppm
slide 20
Hwang 1997
  • Measured speciated urinary As in 300 children near smelter site
  • Average soil levels 121-236 ppm
  • Average urinary arsenic levels 8.6 µg/L
slide 21
Panther Creek, 1998
  • Mining site
  • Soil levels up to 3500 ppm
  • Urine samples tested for As
    • 20/23 below detection levels
    • 6-8 µg/g Cr As in samples where As detected
slide 22
Panther Creek, ID
  • Hair analysis
    • 26/36 below level of detection
    • 7 had elevated hair levels
  • Urine levels not elevated
  • All were remediation workers
  • Likely due to external contamination
slide 23
Past studies of exposure to Arsenic in soil
  • At soil levels < 100 ppm, average urine arsenic is similar to background levels
  • At soil levels > 100 ppm, urinary levels may show exposure but are below levels associated with health effects
 Top of Page
Top