Difference between revisions of "Body packing"

From WikEM
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*Each packet contains about 10g of drug and body packers ingest between 50 to 100 drug containers at a time<ref>Booker RJ. Packers, pushers and stuffers--managing patients with concealed drugs in UK emergency departments: a clinical and medicolegal review. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(5):316-20.</ref>
 
*Each packet contains about 10g of drug and body packers ingest between 50 to 100 drug containers at a time<ref>Booker RJ. Packers, pushers and stuffers--managing patients with concealed drugs in UK emergency departments: a clinical and medicolegal review. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(5):316-20.</ref>
 
*Sometimes packets are inserted rectally or vaginally
 
*Sometimes packets are inserted rectally or vaginally
* Versus body stuffing, ingestion of illicit drugs while pursued by law enforcement; usually small quantity
+
*Distinct from [[Body stuffing]] (ingestion of illicit drugs while pursued by law enforcement, usually small quantity)
  
 
==Clinical Features==
 
==Clinical Features==
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
==Evaluation==
 
==Evaluation==
* History and physical
+
*History and physical
 
**Type of drug
 
**Type of drug
 
**Type of packet wrapping (more likely to rupture or leak if home made)
 
**Type of packet wrapping (more likely to rupture or leak if home made)
Line 56: Line 56:
 
**History is unreliable
 
**History is unreliable
 
**Passage of 2 or 3 packet free bowel movements is not sufficient<ref>Rousset P. Detection of residual packets in cocaine body packers: low accuracy of abdominal radiography-a prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(8):2146-55.</ref>
 
**Passage of 2 or 3 packet free bowel movements is not sufficient<ref>Rousset P. Detection of residual packets in cocaine body packers: low accuracy of abdominal radiography-a prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(8):2146-55.</ref>
 +
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
 +
*[[Body stuffing]]
 
*[[Drugs of abuse]]
 
*[[Drugs of abuse]]
 
*[[Ingested foreign body]]
 
*[[Ingested foreign body]]

Latest revision as of 22:11, 9 May 2017

Background

Abdominal x-ray reveals multiple, oval radiopaque packets throughout the abdomen.
  • Body packers, also called "mules", swallow or insert drug filled packets into body cavity, usually to smuggle them across borders
  • Packets usually made of several layers of latex and outer wax coating
  • Each packet contains about 10g of drug and body packers ingest between 50 to 100 drug containers at a time[1]
  • Sometimes packets are inserted rectally or vaginally
  • Distinct from Body stuffing (ingestion of illicit drugs while pursued by law enforcement, usually small quantity)

Clinical Features

  • Situations in which body packers present to the ED:

Differential Diagnosis

Evaluation

  • History and physical
    • Type of drug
    • Type of packet wrapping (more likely to rupture or leak if home made)
    • Number of packets ingested
    • GI symptoms (pain, distention, obstipation)
    • Other drug use
  • Imaging: KUB, CT abdomen pelvis
  • Urine drug screen: may be misleading

Management

  • Asymptomatic patients
    • Expectant management, no surgery, close monitoring in ICU until passage of all packets
    • Whole bowel irrigation with polyethylene glycol via NGT at 2L per hour
    • Activated charcoal more useful in body stuffers
  • Opioid toxicity
    • Naloxone: may require very high doses
      • 2 to 5mg IV initially, repeat 2mg q5min until responsive
      • then total amount required for response should be given every hour as continuous drip
  • Sympathomimetic toxicity
    • Immediate OR for surgical decontamination
    • No place for conservative management
    • Pharmacologic stabilization appropriate but not definitive, do not delay transfer to the OR
  • Obstruction or perforation
    • OR for immediate ex-lap, then advanced imaging study to document a clear GI tract
    • Endoscopic removal highly controversial, risk of packet perforation

Disposition

  • Admit all to ICU, regardless of symptoms
  • Complete GI decontamination by contrast CT should be documented prior to discharge
    • History is unreliable
    • Passage of 2 or 3 packet free bowel movements is not sufficient[2]

See Also

External Links

References

  1. Booker RJ. Packers, pushers and stuffers--managing patients with concealed drugs in UK emergency departments: a clinical and medicolegal review. Emerg Med J. 2009;26(5):316-20.
  2. Rousset P. Detection of residual packets in cocaine body packers: low accuracy of abdominal radiography-a prospective study. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(8):2146-55.