Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

11 References

1.         National Coalition of STD Directors. 2010.  National guidelines for Internet-based STD and HIV prevention: Accessing the power of the internet for public health. Washington, DC National Coalition of STD Directors.

2.         Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2008. Recommendations for partner services programs for HIV infection, Syphilis, Gonorrhea, and Chlamydial infection. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report; 57, no. RR-9:1-63.

3.         Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Improving Sexually Transmitted Disease Programs through Assessment, Assurance, Policy Development, and Prevention Strategies (STD AAPPS). Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/std/foa/aapps/PS14-1402-FOA-Amendment-I-Final_07-08-13.pdf

4.         Douglas JM, Janssen R. 2005. Dear Colleague Letter. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

5.         Walsh C. Dear Colleague Letter. 2010. Atlanta, Geogia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

6.         Perrin A, Duggan M. Americans’ Internet Access: 2000-2015. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center; 2015.

7.         Pew Research Center. 2014. Cell phone and smartphone ownership demographics. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.

8.         Pew Research Center . 2014. Smartphone owners in 2014. Washington, D.C. : Pew Research Center.

9.         McFarlane M, Bull SS, Rietmeijer CA. 2000. The Internet as a newly emerging risk environment for sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of American Medical Association. 284(4):443-446.

10.       McFarlane M, Kachur R, Bull S, Rietmeijer C. 2002. Women, the Internet, and sexually transmitted infections. Journal of women’s health  Jul-Aug 2004;13(6):689-694.

11.       Garofalo R, Herrick A, Mustanski BS, Donenberg GR. 2007. Tip of the Iceberg: young men who have sex with men, the Internet, and HIV risk. American journal of public health. Jun 97(6):1113-1117.

12.       Horvath KJ, Rosser BR, Remafedi G. 2008Sexual risk taking among young internet-using men who have sex with men. American journal of public health. 98(6):1059-1067.

13.       Buhi ER, Cook RL, Marhefka SL, et al. 2012. Does the Internet represent a sexual health risk environment for young people? Sexually transmitted diseases. 39(1):55-58.

14.       Holloway IW, Dunlap S, Del Pino HE, Hermanstyne K, Pulsipher C, Landovitz RJ. 2014. Online Social Networking, Sexual Risk and Protective Behaviors: Considerations for Clinicians and Researchers. Current Addiction Reports. 1(3):220-228.

15.       Kachur R, Adelson S, Firenze K, Herrera M. 2011. Reaching patients and their partners through mobile: Text messaging for case management and partner notification. Sexually transmitted diseases. 38(2):149-150.

16.       Landovitz RJ, Tseng CH, Weissman M, et al. 2013. Epidemiology, sexual risk behavior, and HIV prevention practices of men who have sex with men using GRINDR in Los Angeles, California. Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 90(4):729-739.

17.       Lehmiller JJ, Ioerger M. 2014. Social networking smartphone applications and sexual health outcomes among men who have sex with men. PloS one. 9(1):e86603.

18.       Grosskopf NA, LeVasseur MT, Glaser DB. 2014. Use of the Internet and mobile-based “apps” for sex-seeking among men who have sex with men in New York City. American journal of men’s health. 8(6):510-520.

19.       Rice E, Holloway IW, Winetrobe H, et al. 2012. Sex risk among young men who have sex with men who use Grindr, a smartphone geosocial networking application. Journal of AIDS & Clinical Research. S4(005).

20.       Phillips G, 2nd, Magnus M, Kuo I, et al. 2014Use of geosocial networking (GSN) mobile phone applications to find men for sex by men who have sex with men (MSM) in Washington, DC. AIDS and behavior. 18(9):1630-1637.

21.       Hunter P, Oyervides O, Grande KM, et al. 2014. Facebook-augmented partner notification in a cluster of syphilis cases in Milwaukee. Public Health Reports. 129(Supplement 1):43-49.

22.       Pennise M, Inscho R, Herpin K, et al. 2015. Using smartphone apps in STD interviews to find sexual partners. Public health reports 130(3):245-252.

23.       Klausner JD, Wolf W, Fischer-Ponce L, Zolt I, Katz MH. 2000. Tracing a syphilis outbreak through cyberspace. Journal of American Medical Association. 284(4):447-449.

24.       Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2003. Internet use and early syphilis infection among men who have sex with men – San Francisco, California, 1999-2003. 1999-2003. MMWR. 52(50):1229-1232.

25.       Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2004. Using the internet for partner notification of sexually transmitted diseases – Los Angeles County, California, 2003. MMWR. 53(6):129-131.

26.       McFarlane M, Kachur R, Klausner JD, Roland E, Cohen M. 2005. Internet-based health promotion and disease control in the 8 cities: Successes, barriers, and future plans. Sexually Transmitted Infection; 32(10):s60-s64.

27.       Vest JR, Valadez AM, Hanner A, Lee JH, Harris PB. 2007. Using e-mail to notify pseudonymous e-mail sexual partners. Sexually transmitted diseases. 34(11):840-845.

28.       Ehlman DC, Jackson M, Saenz G, et al. 2010. Evaluation of an innovative internet-based partner notification program for early syphilis case management, Washington, DC, January 2007-June 2008. Sexually transmitted diseases. 37(8):478-485.

29.       Hunter P, Oyervides O, Grande KM, et al. 2014. Facebook-augmented partner notification in a cluster of syphilis cases in Milwaukee. Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). 129 Suppl 1:43-49.

30.       Mendez J, Maher J. 2012. Evidence supporting the use of text messaging for partner services. Sexually transmitted diseases. 39(3):238-239.

31.       Hightow-Weidman L, Beagle S, Pike E, et al. 2014. “No one’s at home and they won’t pick up the phone”: using the Internet and text messaging to enhance partner services in North Carolina. Sexually transmitted diseases. 41(2):143-148.

32.       Udeagu CC, Bocour A, Shah S, Ramos Y, Gutierrez R, Shepard CW. 2014. Bringing HIV partner services into the age of social media and mobile connectivity. Sexually transmitted diseases. 41(10):631-636.

33.       Mimiaga MJ, Fair AD, Tetu AM, et al. 2008. Acceptability of an internet-based partner notification system for sexually transmitted infection exposure among men who have sex with men. American journal of public health. 98(6):1009-1011.

34.       Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Program Operations Guidelines for STD Prevention: Partner Services. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/std/program/partners.pdf

35.       Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: Early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, July-December 2014. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

36.       Pew Research Center. Cell Phone Activities. Pew Research Center; 2013.

37.       Beymer MR, Weiss RE, Bolan RK, et al. Sex on demand: geospatial networking phone apps and risk of sexually transmitted infections among a cross sectional sample of men who have sex with man in Los Angeles County. Sexually Transmitted Infection. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

38.       Burrell ER, Pines HA, Robbie E, et al. 2012. Use of the location-based social networking application GRINDR as a recruitment tool in rectal microbicide development research. AIDS and behavior. 16(7):1816-1820.

39.       Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. . 2011. Data Security and Confidentiality Guidelines for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Disease, and Tuberculosis Programs: Standards to Facilitate Sharing and Use of Surveillance Data for Public Health Action. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

TOP