Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content
Data & Statistics

Figure G – Distribution of Ceftriaxone Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) among GISP Isolates, 2010-2014

 
This web page is archived for historical purposes and is no longer being updated. Newer data is available on the STD Data and Statistics page.
 

 

CLINIC Ceftriaxone Percentage
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
ALBUQUERQUE <=0.008 84.8 72.4 73.0 74.1 78.1
0.015 6.7 14.5 13.2 15.1 16.7
0.03 5.7 9.9 7.2 7.9 4.4
0.06 2.9 3.3 4.6 2.9 0.9
0.125 . . 2.0 . .
ATLANTA <=0.008 92.3 89.9 80.9 80.3 71.3
0.015 5.2 6.9 11.2 14.0 14.3
0.03 1.4 2.5 5.1 3.7 6.3
0.06 1.0 0.7 2.9 2.0 8.0
BIRMINGHAM <=0.008 81.6 86.8 86.7 92.8 77.6
0.015 15.0 11.8 11.7 5.9 13.5
0.03 1.5 0.9 1.3 1.3 6.3
0.06 1.9 0.5 0.3 . 2.2
0.125 . . . . 0.4
BOSTON <=0.008 . . . . 88.9
0.015 . . . . 3.7
0.03 . . . . 7.4
BUFFALO <=0.008 . . . . 87.4
0.015 . . . . 8.0
0.03 . . . . 2.3
0.06 . . . . 2.3
CHICAGO <=0.008 76.8 72.5 82.5 78.7 90.7
0.015 11.2 19.3 10.2 16.3 4.7
0.03 7.2 5.6 4.0 4.0 4.7
0.06 3.2 2.2 2.2 1.0 .
0.125 1.6 0.4 1.1 . .
CLEVELAND <=0.008 87.7 84.8 85.7 81.4 92.0
0.015 9.4 13.2 13.7 15.6 7.1
0.03 2.4 1.5 0.6 3.0 0.9
0.06 . 0.5 . . .
0.25 0.5 . . . .
COLUMBUS <=0.008 . . 95.6 82.7 79.7
0.015 . . 3.5 11.7 8.3
0.03 . . 0.9 4.3 8.3
0.06 . . . 1.3 3.7
DALLAS <=0.008 86.1 82.0 71.7 74.9 82.0
0.015 10.5 14.6 19.8 18.5 13.3
0.03 3.4 2.2 7.1 6.6 3.7
0.06 . 0.7 1.4 . 1.0
0.125 . 0.4 . . .
GREENSBORO <=0.008 87.8 86.0 78.4 95.8 84.0
0.015 11.1 7.9 15.7 3.6 13.1
0.03 . 5.1 5.9 0.6 2.3
0.06 0.5 0.5 . . 0.5
0.125 0.5 0.5 . . .
HONOLULU <=0.008 74.4 67.2 70.4 83.6 59.8
0.015 9.0 8.2 15.3 9.6 31.1
0.03 7.7 4.9 11.2 5.5 5.7
0.06 7.7 18.0 3.1 1.4 2.5
0.125 . 1.6 . . 0.8
0.25 1.3 . . . .
INDIANAPOLIS <=0.008 . . . 86.3 78.0
0.015 . . . 4.3 9.3
0.03 . . . 6.7 7.3
0.06 . . . 2.7 5.3
KANSAS CITY <=0.008 87.0 78.0 86.7 82.7 81.0
0.015 11.3 19.0 10.7 11.7 14.2
0.03 1.7 2.7 1.7 4.0 3.9
0.06 . 0.3 1.0 1.7 0.4
0.125 . . . . 0.4
LAS VEGAS <=0.008 80.3 80.8 87.0 80.3 64.3
0.015 11.3 12.4 7.1 11.0 25.3
0.03 4.7 4.5 3.6 6.7 7.0
0.06 3.0 2.1 2.0 2.0 3.3
0.125 0.7 0.3 0.4 . .
LOS ANGELES <=0.008 71.6 58.6 60.4 56.7 62.6
0.015 12.9 25.9 18.1 20.6 24.6
0.03 11.0 9.2 14.1 18.6 10.5
0.06 3.8 6.3 6.7 4.1 2.3
0.125 0.8 . 0.7 . .
MINNEAPOLIS <=0.008 63.4 66.0 76.9 56.7 84.5
0.015 22.5 14.9 15.4 21.6 12.6
0.03 9.9 8.5 7.7 16.5 2.9
0.06 2.8 8.5 . 5.2 .
0.125 1.4 2.1 . . .
NEW ORLEANS <=0.008 82.7 79.0 83.3 85.2 67.8
0.015 10.3 13.3 10.3 11.0 23.4
0.03 6.2 4.8 5.4 3.3 8.8
0.06 0.8 2.4 1.0 0.5 .
0.125 . 0.4 . . .
NEW YORK CITY <=0.008 84.3 77.8 84.2 66.7 59.8
0.015 8.1 5.6 8.2 22.0 22.7
0.03 3.5 10.6 4.9 8.5 12.1
0.06 3.0 5.6 2.7 2.1 4.5
0.125 1.0 0.5 . 0.7 .
0.25 . . . . 0.8
ORANGE COUNTY <=0.008 61.5 72.0 71.0 63.7 68.4
0.015 24.0 19.6 18.5 17.7 18.7
0.03 10.6 2.8 6.5 16.9 10.5
0.06 3.8 5.6 3.2 1.6 2.3
0.125 . . 0.8 . .
PHILADELPHIA <=0.008 74.0 87.5 78.0 82.7 64.3
0.015 13.2 6.9 14.3 13.3 24.3
0.03 10.1 4.5 7.3 3.7 6.0
0.06 2.4 0.7 0.3 0.3 5.0
0.125 . 0.3 . . 0.3
0.25 0.3 . . . .
PHOENIX <=0.008 69.8 77.3 89.0 79.3 61.0
0.015 18.6 13.0 9.0 16.3 23.3
0.03 4.5 6.3 1.3 3.0 9.3
0.06 6.5 2.3 0.7 1.3 6.0
0.125 0.5 0.7 . . 0.3
0.25 . 0.3 . . .
PONTIAC <=0.008 . . 89.7 83.7 91.1
0.015 . . 5.7 10.0 3.0
0.03 . . 2.6 5.3 5.9
0.06 . . 2.1 1.1 .
PORTLAND <=0.008 63.2 44.9 57.4 53.5 50.0
0.015 12.3 33.5 25.2 25.6 20.3
0.03 17.9 7.8 10.4 17.8 24.2
0.06 4.7 12.0 4.3 3.1 5.5
0.125 1.9 1.8 2.6 . .
SAN DIEGO <=0.008 69.8 55.7 62.4 68.8 65.6
0.015 11.7 18.1 17.6 14.2 15.1
0.03 11.7 18.1 11.2 15.3 14.2
0.06 6.3 7.6 8.8 1.7 5.0
0.125 0.5 0.5 . . .
SAN FRANCISCO <=0.008 78.7 64.6 60.9 56.9 60.0
0.015 14.3 18.9 17.4 16.7 21.3
0.03 5.2 9.0 17.4 22.3 17.0
0.06 0.9 6.6 3.9 3.7 1.7
0.125 0.9 0.9 0.4 0.4 .
SEATTLE <=0.008 52.9 50.3 48.3 38.5 53.6
0.015 17.6 32.9 25.5 23.8 13.9
0.03 26.5 11.4 16.1 31.5 25.3
0.06 2.9 4.8 9.4 6.3 6.7
0.125 . 0.6 0.7 . .
0.25 . . . . 0.5
TRIPLER <=0.008 75.0 100.0 57.1 54.5 50.0
0.015 25.0 . 35.7 9.1 30.0
0.03 . . 7.1 27.3 20.0
0.06 . . . 9.1 .
TOP