Peter A. Briss, MD, MPH

Suggested citation for this article: Briss PA. Exploring Better Links Between Clinics and Communities to Improve Population Health. Prev Chronic Dis 2015;12:140568. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.140568.

In this issue of Preventing Chronic Disease, Kristal et al (1) report on analyses of several standardized questions about health behaviors related to sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and other aspects of diet and physical activity in a Bronx population served by several federally qualified health centers. These analyses are part of a larger project that links clinical and community approaches to measuring and improving diet and physical activity behaviors. Other components of the larger project included electronic health record (EHR)–based referrals to community diabetes prevention resources and enhanced community access to more healthful foods. The larger project illustrates several innovative approaches that health care and community organizations might use for advancing population health through improved delivery of high-quality health care and better links between clinical and community resources.

The study by Kristal et al highlights the importance of measuring and acting on health-risk behaviors in both clinical and community settings. In the United States, just 4 modifiable risk behaviors (tobacco use, poor nutrition, physical inactivity, and unhealthy alcohol use) account for about 40% of mortality (2). In their study, Kristal et al programmed questions for assessing selected risk behaviors into the EHR. These questions, derived from the state-based Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, also are used in the New York City Community Health Survey. The use of similar questions at several population levels (ie, clinic, community, and state) increases the ability of health care and community health providers and decision makers to use comparable data on risk factors and health outcomes in populations in different settings and at local, state, and national levels for diverse purposes — detecting problems, monitoring trends, targeting and triggering interventions, and comparing the results achieved in various health care and community contexts.

The study by Kristal et al also illustrates how use of the EHR and team-based care can better support disease prevention and health promotion. For many clinical providers, preventive care can be difficult to deliver consistently because of limitations on provider time. To illustrate this problem, one study estimated that in a typical primary care practice with a panel size of 2,500 and an age and sex distribution similar to that of the United States, a physician would require 7.4 hours per day to provide all services recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force (3). In the study by Kristal et al, the process of documenting lifestyle-behavior questions was incorporated into clinic workflows by automatically generating EHR reminders, prompting nursing staff to ask the questions during intake assessments. Physicians then followed up on the results. This approach to building prevention into clinic workflows and systematically sharing tasks between clinic staff can improve the extent and efficiency of preventive care delivery. As the US health care system continues to shift from paying for services to paying for value, and as quality measures increasingly affect those payments, team-based care will become increasingly important for delivering preventive and clinical services.

A recent Institute of Medicine report noted that “achieving substantial and lasting improvements in population health will require a concerted effort from . . . [a wide range of entities including both health care and public health] . . . aligned with a common goal” (4). The study described by Kristal et al expands the menu of innovative opportunities for bridging clinical settings and communities with the intention of improving population health. Other ongoing efforts operate across a spectrum of populations and settings, ranging from the local to national levels (Box). These efforts underscore the recognition that the health care and public health sectors each has an important role in improving population health and that neither can maximize health by working in isolation.

Top

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Peter A. Briss, MD, MPH, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Mail Stop K-40, Atlanta, GA 30341. Telephone: 770-488-5410. Email: pxb5@cdc.gov.

Top

References

1. Kristal RB, Blank AE, Wylie-Rosett J, Selwyn PA. Factors associated with daily consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages among adult patients at four federally qualified health centers, Bronx, New York, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis 2015. CrossRef
2. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA 2004;291(10):1238–45. CrossRef PubMed
3. Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health 2003;93(4):635–41. CrossRef PubMed
4. Institute of Medicine. Primary care and public health: exploring integration to improve population health. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2012.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Million hearts: strategies to reduce the prevalence of leading cardiovascular disease risk factors — United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2011;60(36):1248–51. PubMed
6. Albright AL, Gregg EW. Preventing type 2 diabetes in communities across the U.S.: the National Diabetes Prevention Program. Am J Prev Med 2013;44(Suppl 4):S346–51. CrossRef PubMed
7. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Durham way. http://www.rwjf.org/en/about-rwjf/newsroom/features-and-articles/culture-of-health-prize/durham-nc-2014.html. Accessed November 28, 2014.
8. Truman Medical Centers. Truman Medical Centers: Healthy Harvest Produce Market. http://www.trumed.org/files/fact-sheet/Healthy-Harvest-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Accessed December 9, 2014.

Top