|
|
Volume
2:
No. 3, July 2005
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Terminology in “Rural
Community Knowledge of Stroke Warning Signs and Risk Factors”
Suggested citation for this article: Day MW. Terminology in “Rural
community knowledge of stroke warning signs and risk factors” [letter to
the editor]. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2005 Jul
[date cited]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/ jul/05_0040.htm.
To the Editor:
While I appreciate the effort of Blades et al in conducting the valuable research for “Rural Community Knowledge of Stroke Warning Signs and Risk Factors”
(1), I believe that respondents to the survey do not necessarily represent rural communities. The authors cite county population densities as justification for using this classification; however, Cascade and
Yellowstone counties contain two of the largest cities in the state of Montana. Statistically, the survey would have had to include a disproportionately large number of respondents who live either in the city’s limits or its nearby suburbs. In addition, the authors did not note this as a limitation of the study. A survey using
zip codes for small towns (less than 5000 inhabitants) more
than 30 miles from a tertiary health care facility would be a more appropriate methodology in determining a true rural community.
Michael W. Day, RN, MSN, CCRN
Outreach Educator and Clinical Nurse Specialist
Northwest MedStar
Spokane, Wash
References
- Blades LL, Oser CS, Dietrich DW, Okon NJ, Rodriguez DV, Burnett AM, et
al.
Rural community knowledge of stroke warning signs and risk factors. Prev Chronic
Dis [serial online] 2005 Apr [cited 2005 Apr 1].
Back to top
|
|