Radiographic classification of osteoarthritis

Radiographic systems to classify osteoarthritis vary by which joint is being investigated. In osteoarthritis, the choice of treatment is based on pain and decreased function, but radiography can be useful before surgery in order to prepare for the procedure.

Radiographic classification of osteoarthritis
Medical diagnostics
PurposeQuantify the degree of osteoarthritis
Based onMedical imaging

Vertebral column

There are many grading systems for degeneration of intervertebral discs and facet joints in the cervical and lumbar vertebrae, of which the following radiographic systems can be recommended in terms of interobserver reliability:[1]

  • Kellgren grading of cervical disc degeneration
  • Kellgren grading of cervical facet joint degeneration
  • Lane grading of lumbar disc degeneration
  • Thompson grading of lumbar disc degeneration (by Magnetic resonance imaging)
  • Pathria grading of lumbar facet joint degeneration (by computed tomography)
  • Weishaupt grading of lumbar facet joint degeneration (by MRI and computed tomography)
Kellgren grading of cervical disc degeneration[2]
I
  • Minimal anterior osteophytosis
II
  • Definite anterior osteophytosis
  • Possible disc space narrowing
  • Some endplate sclerosis
III
  • Moderate disc space narrowing
  • Definite endplate sclerosis
  • Osteophytosis
IV
  • Severe disc space narrowing
  • Endplate sclerosis
  • Multiple large osteophytes.
Lane grading of lumbar disc degeneration[1]
GradeJoint space narrowingOsteophytesSclerosis
0 NoneNoneNone
1 Definite but mild narrowingSmallPresent
2 ModerateModerate–
3 Severe (complete joint space loss)Large–

The Thomson grading system is regarded to have more academic than clinical value.[1]

Thomson grading of lumbar disc degeneration[1]
GradeNucleusAnulusEndplateVertebral body
I Bulging gelDiscrete fibrous laminaeHyaline, uniform thicknessRounded margins
II Peripheral white fibrous tissueMucinous material between laminaeIrregular thicknessPointed margins
III Consolidated fibrous tissueExtensive mucinous infiltration; loss of annular-nuclear demarcationFocal defects in cartilageSmall chondrophytes or osteophytes at margins
IV Horizontal clefts parallel to endplateFocal disruptionsFibrocartilage extending from subchondral bone; irregularity and focal sclerosis in subchondral boneOsteophytes smaller than 2 mm
V Clefts extended through nucleus and annulusDiffuse sclerosisOsteophytes greater than 2 mm

Shoulder

The Samilson-Prieto classification is preferable for osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint.[3]

Samilson-Prieto classification[4]
GradeDescription
MildExostosis of inferior humerus and/or glenoid measuring less than 3 mm
ModerateExostosis of inferior humerus and/or glenoid measuring 3–7 mm, and slight irregularity of the joint
SevereExostosis of inferior humerus and/or glenoid measuring more than 7 mm in height as well as sclerosis and narrowing of the joint space (normal joint space is 4–5 mm).[5]

Hip
Hip joint with no signs of osteoarthritis.

The most commonly used radiographic classification system for osteoarthritis of the hip joint is the Kellgren-Lawrence system (or K-L system).[6] It uses plain radiographs.

Kellgren-Lawrence system
Grade Description
0 No radiographic features of osteoarthritis
1 Possible joint space narrowing (normal joint space is at least 2 mm at the superior acetabulum)[7] and osteophyte formation
2 Definite osteophyte formation with possible joint space narrowing
3 Multiple osteophytes, definite joint space narrowing, sclerosis and possible bony deformity
4 Large osteophytes, marked joint space narrowing, severe sclerosis and definite bony deformity

Osteoarthritis of the hip joint may also be graded by Tönnis classification. There is no consensus whether it is more or less reliable than the Kellgren-Lawrence system.[8]

Severe (Tönnis grade 3) osteoarthritis of the hip.
Tönnis classification[9]
Grade Description
0No osteoarthritis signs
1Mild:
  • increased osteosclerosis
  • minor joint space narrowing (normal joint space is at least 2 mm at the superior acetabulum)[7]
  • no or minor loss of head sphericity
2Moderate:
  • small bone cyst
  • moderate joint space narrowing
  • moderate loss of head sphericity
3Severe:
  • large bone cysts
  • severe joint space narrowing, or joint space obliteration
  • severe deformity of the head

Knee

For the grading of osteoarthritis in the knee, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) system is regarded to have the most favorable combination of interobserver precision and correlation to knee arthroscopy findings.[10] It was formed by a group of knee surgeons from Europe and America who met in 1987 to develop a standard form to measure results of knee ligament reconstructions.[11]

The Ahlbäck system has been found to have comparable interobserver precision and arthroscopy correlation to the IKDC system, but most of the span of the Ahlbäck system focused at various degrees of bone defect or loss, and it is therefore less useful in early osteoarthritis.[10] Systems that have been found to have lower interobserver precision and/or arthroscopy correlation are those developed by Kellgren-Lawrence, Fairbank, Brandt, and Jäger-Wirth.[10]

International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) system[10]
GradeFindings
A No joint space narrowing, defined in this system as at least 4 mm joint space
B At least 4 mm joint space, but small osteophytes, slight sclerosis, or femoral condyle flattening
C 2–4 mm joint space
D <2 mm joint space
Ahlbäck classification[12]
GradeFindings
IJoint space narrowing, with or without subchondral sclerosis. Joint space narrowing is defined by this system as a joint space less than 3 mm, or less than half of the space in the other compartment, or less than half of the space of the homologous compartment of the other knee.
IIObliteration of the joint space
IIIBone defect/loss <5 mm
IVBone defect/loss between 5 and 10 mm
VBone defect/loss >10 mm, often with subluxation and arthritis of the other compartment

For the patellofemoral joint, a classification by Merchant 1974 uses a 45° "skyline" view of the patella:[13]

Merchant system
Stage Description
1 (mild)Patellofemoral joint space > 3mm
2 (moderateJoint space < 3 mm but no bony contact
3 (severe)Bony surfaces in contact over less than one quarter of the joint surface
4 (very severe)Bony contact throughout the entire joint surface

Other joints
  • In the temporomandibular joint, subchondral sclerosis of the mandibular condyle has been described as an early change, condylar flattening as a feature of progressive osteoarthritis, and narrowing of the temporomandibular joint space as a late stage change.[14] A joint space of between 1.5 and 4 mm is regarded as normal.[15]
Ankle osteoarthritis.
  • Talus - medial malleolus : 1.70 ± 0.13 mm
  • Talus - tibial plafond: 2.04 ± 0.29 mm
  • Talus - lateral malleolus: 2.13 ± 0.20 mm

See also
  • WOMAC, a non-radiographic classification system of osteoarthritis, taking into account pain, stiffness and functional limitation.[18]

References
  1. Kettler, Annette; Wilke, Hans-Joachim (2005). "Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration". European Spine Journal. 15 (6): 705–718. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0954-y. ISSN 0940-6719. PMC 3489462.
  2. Ofiram, Elisha; Garvey, Timothy A.; Schwender, James D.; Denis, Francis; Perra, Joseph H.; Transfeldt, Ensor E.; Winter, Robert B.; Wroblewski, Jill M. (2009). "Cervical degenerative index: a new quantitative radiographic scoring system for cervical spondylosis with interobserver and intraobserver reliability testing". Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 10 (1): 21–26. doi:10.1007/s10195-008-0041-3. ISSN 1590-9921. PMC 2657349.
  3. Brox, Jens; Lereim, Paul; Merckoll, Else; Finnanger, Anne Marie (2009). "Radiographic classification of glenohumeral arthrosis". Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 74 (2): 186–189. doi:10.1080/00016470310013932. ISSN 0001-6470.
  4. Page 117 in Barbara N. W. Weissman (2009). Imaging of Arthritis and Metabolic Bone Disease. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9780323041775.
  5. "Glenohumeral joint space". radref.org., in turn citing: Petersson, Claes J.; Redlund-Johnell, Inga (2009). "Joint Space in Normal Gleno-Humeral Radiographs". Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 54 (2): 274–276. doi:10.3109/17453678308996569. ISSN 0001-6470.
  6. Zdravko Jotanovic, Radovan Mihelic, Gordan Gulan, Branko Sestan, Zlatko Dembic (2015). "Osteoarthritis of the hip: An overview". Periodicum biologorum. 117 (1).CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. Lequesne, M (2004). "The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 63 (9): 1145–1151. doi:10.1136/ard.2003.018424. ISSN 0003-4967. PMC 1755132.
  8. Terjesen, Terje; Gunderson, Ragnhild B (2012). "Radiographic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the hip". Acta Orthopaedica. 83 (2): 185–189. doi:10.3109/17453674.2012.665331. ISSN 1745-3674. PMC 3339535.
  9. "Tönnis Classification of Osteoarthritis by Radiographic Changes". Society of Preventive Hip Surgery. Retrieved 2016-12-13.
  10. "Osteoarthritis Classification Scales: Interobserver Reliability and Arthroscopic Correlation". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 96 (14): 1145–1151. 2014. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00929. ISSN 0021-9355. PMC 4083772.
  11. Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli HU (1993). "Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form". Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1 (3–4): 226–34. doi:10.1007/bf01560215. PMID 8536037.
  12. Hernández-Vaquero, Daniel; Fernández-Carreira, José Manuel (2012). "Relationship between radiological grading and clinical status in knee osteoarthritis. a multicentric study". BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 13 (1). doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-194. ISSN 1471-2474.
  13. Kim, Young-Mo; Joo, Yong-Bum (2012). "Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis". Knee Surgery & Related Research. 24 (4): 193–200. doi:10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.4.193. ISSN 2234-0726. PMC 3526755.
  14. Page 722 in Gary S. Firestein, Ralph Budd, Sherine E Gabriel, Iain B. McInnes, James R O'Dell (2012). Kelley's Textbook of Rheumatology E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9781455737673.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. Massilla Mani, F.; Sivasubramanian, S. Satha (2016). "A study of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis using computed tomographic imaging". Biomedical Journal. 39 (3): 201–206. doi:10.1016/j.bj.2016.06.003. ISSN 2319-4170.
  16. Nicolas Holzer, Davide Salvo, Anne Karien Marijnissen, Aminudin Che Ahmad, Emanuele Sera, Pierre Hoffmeyer, Anne Lübbeke Wolff, Mathieu Assal (2017-09-14). "How to assess ankle osteoarthritis: comparison of the Kellgren and Lawrence scale with functional outcome and digital image analysis". Orthopaedic Proceedings. 94-B.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. Imai, Kan; Ikoma, Kazuya; Kido, Masamitsu; Maki, Masahiro; Fujiwara, Hiroyoshi; Arai, Yuji; Oda, Ryo; Tokunaga, Daisaku; Inoue, Nozomu; Kubo, Toshikazu (2015). "Joint space width of the tibiotalar joint in the healthy foot". Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 8 (1). doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0086-5. ISSN 1757-1146.
  18. Quintana, José M.; Escobar, Antonio; Arostegui, Inmaculada; Bilbao, Amaia; Azkarate, Jesús; Goenaga, J. Ignacio; Arenaza, Juan C. (2006). "Health-Related Quality of Life and Appropriateness of Knee or Hip Joint Replacement". Archives of Internal Medicine. 166 (2): 220. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.2.220. ISSN 0003-9926.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.