Dilation and evacuation

Dilation and evacuation (D&E) is the dilation of the cervix and surgical evacuation of the uterus (potentially including the fetus, placenta and other tissue) after the first trimester of pregnancy. It is a method of abortion as well as a common procedure used after miscarriage to remove all pregnancy tissue.[1][2]

Dilation and evacuation
(D&E)
Background
Abortion type Surgical
First use 1970s
Gestation 13-24 weeks
Usage
UK: Eng. & Wales 45% (2005)
Infobox references

In various health care centers it may be called by different names:

  • D&E (Dilation and evacuation)
  • ERPOC (Evacuation of Retained Products of Conception)
  • TOP or STOP ((Surgical) Termination Of Pregnancy)

D&E normally refers to a specific second trimester procedure.[2] However, some sources use the term D&E to refer more generally to any procedure that involves the processes of dilation and evacuation, which includes the first trimester procedures of manual and electric vacuum aspiration.[1] Intact Dilation and Extraction (D&X) is a different procedural variation on D&E.[3]

Indications for D&E

Dilation and evacuation (D&E) is one of the methods available to completely remove the fetus and all of the placental tissue in the uterus after the first trimester of pregnancy.[4] A D&E may be performed for a surgical abortion, or for surgical management of a miscarriage.[5]

Abortion

Induced abortion after the first trimester of pregnancy is rare. Approximately 630,000 abortions were performed in the US in 2015, the most recent year for which data are available. Fewer than 10% of all abortions in the United States are performed after 13 weeks of gestation, and just over 1% are performed after 21 weeks gestation.[6] In the United States, 95-99% of abortions after the first trimester of pregnancy are performed by surgical abortion via dilation and evacuation.[6]

People who do not have access to affordable abortion care in their area or who face legal restrictions to obtaining a wanted abortion may wait longer to get an abortion after they make the decision to terminate their pregnancy. When an abortion is delayed, a D&E may be necessary.[7]

Miscarriage

Dilation and evacuation can be offered for management of second trimester miscarriage if skilled providers are available.[5] Some women choose D&E over labor induction for a second trimester loss because it can be a scheduled surgical procedure, offering predictability over labor induction, or because they find it emotionally easier than undergoing labor and delivery. Both methods offer the option of fetal and placental testing. Although pregnancy loss is emotionally distressing, there are rarely medical complications associated with a short (< 1 week) delay to management.[8]

Description of procedure

Cervical preparation

Prior to the procedure, cervical preparation with osmotic dilators or medications is recommended in order to reduce risk of complications such as cervical laceration and to facilitate cervical dilation during the procedure.[9][10][11] There is no consensus as to which cervical preparation method is superior in terms of safety and technical ease of the procedure.[12] At later gestational ages, patients may require a two day procedure with cervical preparation occurring the day prior to the D&E.

Anesthesia options

Most patients will be provided NSAIDs for pain management. Local anesthetics, such as lidocaine, are frequently injected by the cervix to reduce pain during the procedure.[13][14][15] IV sedation may also be used. General anesthesia may be used depending on individual circumstances, however it is not preferred as it adds significant anesthesia risks to the procedure.[13]:90-100

Infection prophylaxis

Immediately prior to the procedure, antibiotics are usually administered to prevent infection.[14]

Surgical procedure

A speculum is placed in the vagina to allow visualization of the cervix. If osmotic dilators were placed prior to the procedure, these are removed.[16]

The cervix may be further dilated with rigid dilator instruments (as opposed to osmotic dilators.) Sufficient cervical dilation decreases the risk of morbidity, including cervical injury and uterine perforation.[12][14] Uterine contents are removed using a cannula to apply aspiration, followed by forceps.[17] Tissue inspection ensures removal of the fetus in its entirety. The procedure may be performed under ultrasound guidance to aid in visualizing uterine anatomy and to assess if all tissue has been removed at the completion of the procedure.[13]

The procedure usually takes less than half an hour.[18]

Recovery

Most D&E's are performed in the outpatient setting, and can be safely sent home same day after a period of observed recovery, ranging from 45 minutes to several hours. Generally, the woman may return to work the following day.[18] The type of anesthesia given also influences the appropriate amount of recovery time before discharge. There is rarely a need for narcotic pain medications afterwards, and NSAIDs are recommended for home pain management. Recovery from the procedure is typically fast and uncomplicated.[19]:174

Some women may experience lactation after a second-trimester loss or termination of pregnancy. At this time, medications to suppress lactation are not proven to be effective. [20]

Variations

If the fetus is removed intact, the procedure is referred to as intact dilation and extraction by the American Medical Association,[21] and referred to as "intact dilation and evacuation" by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).[22]

Risks

D&E is a safe procedure when performed by experienced practitioners.[13] The rate of mortality following legal in the US is 0.62 legal induced abortion-related deaths per 100,000 reported legal abortions. The strongest risk factor for mortality following abortion is increasing gestational age.[23]

Risks of D&E include bleeding, infection, uterine perforation, and damage to surrounding organs or tissues . Hemorrhage occurs following less than 1% of all surgical abortions.[14] Infection rates following second trimester abortion have been reported to be 0.1-4%.[14] The risk of infection is decreased by the use of antibiotics. Rare risks of D&E include uterine perforation, retained products of conception, and rare risk of hysterectomy.[13]

There is no evidence that surgical abortion causes in increase in infertility or adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies.[13]:252-254

Alternatives
  • Pregnancy continuation (if the procedure if being performed for abortion)
    • Parenting
    • Adoption
  • Labor induction abortion

Complication rates after D&E are similar to or lower than those of labor induction (medical abortion) after 13 weeks, though few studies exist comparing the two approaches.[24] .[25] [26]. In certain clinical scenarios--severe anemia, for example-- D&E may be preferred over labor induction.[24]

Law

Proposals to limit abortion access sometimes target specific procedures such as D&E, though this also restricts access for non-abortion patients, such as those with pregnancy loss.[27]

See also

References
  1. "Miscarriage". EBSCO Publishing Health Library. Brigham and Women's Hospital. January 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-04-07.
  2. "Dilation and evacuation (D&E) for abortion". Healthwise. WebMD. 2004-10-07. Archived from the original on 2007-05-02. Retrieved 2007-04-07.
  3. Haskell, Martin (1992-09-13). "Dilation and Extraction for Late Second Trimester Abortion". National Abortion Federation Risk Management Seminar. Dallas, Texas. Archived from the original on September 16, 2006. Retrieved 2007-05-05.
  4. Stubblefield, Phillip G.; Carr-Ellis, Sacheen; Borgatta, Lynn (July 2004). "Methods for Induced Abortion". Obstetrics & Gynecology. 104 (1): 174–185. doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000130842.21897.53. ISSN 0029-7844. PMID 15229018.
  5. "ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: Management of Stillbirth". Obstetrics & Gynecology. 113 (3): 748–761. March 2009. doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31819e9ee2. ISSN 0029-7844. PMID 19300347.
  6. Jatlaoui, Tara C.; Boutot, Maegan E.; Mandel, Michele G.; Whiteman, Maura K.; Ti, Angeline; Petersen, Emily; Pazol, Karen (2018-11-23). "Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2015". MMWR. Surveillance Summaries. 67 (13): 1–45. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6713a1. ISSN 1546-0738. PMC 6289084. PMID 30462632.
  7. "Later Abortion". Guttmacher Institute. 2016-10-13. Retrieved 2019-07-29.
  8. "ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 102: Management of Stillbirth". Obstetrics & Gynecology. 113 (3): 748–761. March 2009. doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31819e9ee2. ISSN 0029-7844. PMID 19300347.
  9. Organization, World Health (2014). Clinical practice handbook for safe abortion. World Health Organization. Reproductive Health and Research. Geneva, Switzerland. p. 37. ISBN 9789241548717. OCLC 879416856.
  10. Fox, Michelle C.; Krajewski, Colleen M. (February 2014). "Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks' gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4". Contraception. 89 (2): 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.001. ISSN 1879-0518. PMID 24331860.
  11. "Second-Trimester Abortion - ACOG". www.acog.org. Retrieved 2019-07-09.
  12. Newmann, Sara J.; Dalve-Endres, Andrea; Diedrich, Justin T.; Steinauer, Jody E.; Meckstroth, Karen; Drey, Eleanor A. (2010-08-04). "Cervical preparation for second trimester dilation and evacuation". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (8): CD007310. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007310.pub2. ISSN 1469-493X. PMID 20687085.
  13. Paul, Maureen, Hrsg. Lichtenberg, Steve, Hrsg. Borgatta, Lynn, Hrsg. Grimes, David A., Hrsg. Stubblefield, Phillip G., Hrsg. Creinin, Mitchell D., Hrsg. (2011). Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy Comprehensive Abortion Care. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9781444358476. OCLC 899157428.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. "Second-Trimester Abortion - ACOG". www.acog.org. Retrieved 2019-07-09.
  15. Allen, Rebecca H.; Singh, Rameet (June 2018). "Society of Family Planning clinical guidelines pain control in surgical abortion part 1 — local anesthesia and minimal sedation". Contraception. 97 (6): 471–477. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.01.014. ISSN 0010-7824. PMID 29407363.
  16. Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy : comprehensive abortion care. Paul, Maureen. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 2009. ISBN 978-1444312935. OCLC 424554827.CS1 maint: others (link)
  17. Organization, World Health (2014). Clinical practice handbook for safe abortion. World Health Organization. Reproductive Health and Research. Geneva, Switzerland. p. 52. ISBN 9789241548717. OCLC 879416856.
  18. Hammond, C. (2009). "Recent advances in second-trimester abortion: an evidence-based review". Am J Obstet Gynecol. 200 (4): 347–56. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.016. PMID 19318143.
  19. Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy : comprehensive abortion care. Paul, Maureen. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. 2009. ISBN 978-1444312935. OCLC 424554827.CS1 maint: others (link)
  20. Oladapo, Olufemi T; Fawole, Bukola (2012-09-12). Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group (ed.). "Treatments for suppression of lactation". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (9): CD005937. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005937.pub3. PMC 6599849. PMID 22972088.
  21. Health and Ethics Policies of the AMA American Medical Association. H-5.982 Retrieved April 24, 2007.
  22. ACOG Statement on the US Supreme Court Decision Upholding the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003 Archived 2007-06-11 at the Wayback Machine (April 18, 2007). Retrieved 2007-04-22.
  23. Jatlaoui, Tara C.; Boutot, Maegan E.; Mandel, Michele G.; Whiteman, Maura K.; Ti, Angeline; Petersen, Emily; Pazol, Karen (2018-11-23). "Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2015". MMWR. Surveillance Summaries. 67 (13): 1–45. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6713a1. ISSN 1546-0738. PMC 6289084. PMID 30462632.
  24. Borgatta, Lynn; Kapp, Nathalie (2011). "Labor induction abortion in the second trimester". Contraception. 84 (1): 4–18. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.005. PMID 21664506.
  25. Sonalkar, Sarita; Ogden, Shannon N.; Tran, Linda K.; Chen, Angela Y. (2017-06-23). "Comparison of complications associated with induction by misoprostol versus dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortion". International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 138 (3): 272–275. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12229. ISSN 0020-7292. PMID 28585710.
  26. "Complication Rate Is Lower For Surgical Than Medical Second-Trimester Abortion". Guttmacher Institute. 2005-09-08. Retrieved 2019-08-22.
  27. "Bans on Specific Abortion Methods Used After the First Trimester". Guttmacher Institute. 2016-08-16. Retrieved 2019-08-29.

.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.